Article Directory | Free Articles

Article Directory | Free Articles for Reprint!


Do you need support on this site or want to chat? Sign up on our support forum at MarketingForums.Net HERE
Articles » Education
Quality Improvement

Author: Ed Bones
Author's Website: www.rent-an-auditor.co.uk
Added: June 3, 2008

Copyright (c) 2008 Ed Bones

Following the development of a management system for Quality - e.g. ISO9001' is the need to maintain and improve the performance of such a system. ISO 9001 in its current form needs the organisation to continually get better, and for auditors and managers alike this betterment requirement has been tough to define and therefore to demonstrate.

Independent of any registration process, it would be generally accepted that an improvement in the management system could only be evidenced through improvement in the processes and outputs of the business. Internally this might show as reductions in costs due to reduced waste, faster cycle times etc. But these improvements don't happen by chance, or if they do, they are susceptible to reversion. Improvement requires positive action based on reliable information and sound judgement, followed by the application of a defined and controlled process. It is here that we bring together the two terms of our heading.

A web search for Zero Defects will reveal a multitude of entries from Six Sigma exponents vilifying the ZD concept as impractical and even ineffective in the search for significant improvement. The fact that many of these people lack any personal experience through involvement in management improvement seems not to bother them. Frequent references to Phil Crosby's 'Zero Defects' and 'Quality is Free' statements appear to be the result of hearsay rather than any careful study.

I don't think I need to defend Crosby or his record - which stands alone. However, there is some value in re-stating both the theory and reality of the ZD and Free Quality concepts.

The sequence starts with a definition of quality - Conformance to Requirements was the earliest iteration, and this seems a good start. For most organisations there is either a statement of requirements that is achievable, or there is no adequate statement of requirements, and that is clearly the route to disaster. However, such a situation is not unknown, comments such as 'the customer doesn't know what he wants' are not infrequently used to explain how a major piece of work has got underway without a clear definition of requirements.

Having achieved a satisfactory and adequate definition that all parties have signed up to, we now consider what performance standard we are committed to. Crosby's definition of performance standard was Zero Defects. We will try always to achieve a fault-free performance. How can anyone dispute this as a reasonable objective, and yet they do. To quote Robert Galvin, under whose direction the Motorola Company initiated the first Six Sigma program, "Perfection is our final objective". Not just zero defects for Motorola, but perfection.

The anti-ZD brigade call up their Six Sigma argument to show that as they have difficulty achieving their objective, ZD must be a fiction, a motivational program they say, and clearly too expensive to be a realistic objective. What is usually missing from this is an understanding of the nature of ZD. Unlike Six Sigma, it is not a tool or set of tools, it is a performance standard. It is in fact the performance standard we personally set for ourselves each day. We don't agree to defects in our salary statement, or payments to the bank. We object to errors in change at the shop. We particularly reject food that fails to meet our requirements, every time!

So Zero Defects is a performance standard applicable to every situation, to advance on Crosby's explanation, would we really settle for a less than perfection performance standard at our local hospital if we or our close family were the recipients of the treatment?

Zero Defects is the performance standard we need to embrace, while anything less tells us, our associates, and the world at large that Quality (conformance to requirements) is simply a slogan with no depth of meaning.

---

Meon Consulting, founded by Ed Bones, was formed to assist clients with managing their businesses in a manner compliant with ISO9001/14001. Ed had earlier held a number of senior posts with Hi-Tech companies in the UK, Europe and USA. He has written and lectured on full range of topics on quality improvement and TQM. http://www.rent-an-auditor.co.uk .To obtain your FREE Presentation please visit http://www.rent-an-auditor.co.uk/contactus.html



Comments

Search

Categories
 Latest Articles
 Advertisements
 Advice
 Arts and Crafts
 Automotive
 Business
   Accounting
   Advertising
   Business Management
   Career
   Customer Service
   Franchising
   Fundraising
   Marketing
   Networking
   Outsourcing
   PR
   Resumes
   Sales
   Small Business
   Team Building
 Cancer
   Breast Cancer
   Ovarian Cancer
   Prostate Cancer
   Skin Cancer
 Classifieds
 Computers and Technology
 Culture
 Dating
 Education
 Entertainment
 Environment
 Etiquette
 Family
 Finance
 Food and Drinks
   Chocolate
   Coffee
   Cooking Tips
   Recipes
   Tea
   Wine
 Gambling
 Gardening
 Goverment
 Health
 Home Management
 Humor
 Insurance
 Internet
   Affiliate Programs
   Auctions
   Blogging
   Domain Names
   E-Books
   Ecommerce
   Email Marketing
   Forums
   Internet Marketing
   Link Building
   PPC
   RSS
   Security
   SEM
   SEO
   Site Promotion
   Traffic Building
   Web Design
   Web Development
   Web Hosting
 Investment
 Jobs
 Kids and Teens
 Legal
 Marriage
 Medicines and Remedies
 Motivational
 Multimedia
 Music
 Parenting
 Pets
 Politics
 Product Reviews
 Psychology
 Real Estate
 Recreation
 Relationships
 Religion
 Science
 Self-Help
 Sexuality
 Society
 Sports
 Travel
 Wellness, Fitness and Diet
 Womens Interest
 Writing